In this paper the energy impact of natural cross ventilation is examined conducting a set of crossventilation experiments in a well insulated apartment of a 5-storey building. The experimental resultscompared with simulation results derived from the combined use of the multizone air flow modelCOMIS and the thermal model Suncode.A 24-hour lasting natural cross ventilation experiment was conducted, to monitor thermal comfortventilation mainly during the day and night time cooling ventilation.
There are a number of methods available concerning with distribution of air in buildings. Within control research, one can find new control algorithms which have not yet been used in practice. These new algorithms open the possibility of developing andimplementing of new demand controlled ventilation systems.In a building the internal air motions are due both to differences in temperature andpressure differences caused by the ventilation system.
The aim of the study was to investigate the operation of different types of ventilation in placesconstructed underground and ground level; the effect of ventilation on indoor radon levels wasalso examined. Air exchange rates and radon concentrations were measured in underground(n=73) and ground level (n=64) workplaces. Air exchange rates, designed exhaust ventilationflows, ventilation rates per person and area were sigmficantly higher in underground placesthan places constructed on the ground level.
This paper will present a general approach that may be used to solve natural ventilation designproblems typically addressed at the preliminary design stage - How wide should windows beopened in a given building for wind-driven cross ventilation on a moderate summer day? Howshould a ventilating monitor be configured to mitigate internal and solar gains on the samesummer day?
The IEA project Annex 27, Evaluation and Demonstration of Domestic Ventilation Systems,have come to the stage that simplified tools can be presented in a total scheme. At earlierAIVC conferences some of the tools have been presented in separate papers and still the toolsare under development. In this paper a more general approach of the usage of the tools is to bepresented.The work is based on the joint work of participants from both AIVC countries (CAN,F, NL, S, UK, USA) and non-AIVC countries (I, J).
The main goal of IEA Annex 27 "Evaluation of ventilation systems" is to develop tools toevaluate ventilation systems in an objective way in terms of indoor air quality, energy,comfort, noise, life cycle costs, reliability and other building related parameters.To check the developed tools some measurements in real dwellings are necessary. Thedevelopment of the tools is in its final stage. During the AIVC conference some of these toolswill be presented. The indoor air quality tool is not yet ready.
Costs are one of the main decision factors for the selection of domestic ventilation systems.This often leads to a ventilation system that just meets the requirements of buildingregulations at the lowest initial costs. Decision makers are often not aware of the impact of thequality of the ventilation system on life cycle costs, not only for the ventilation system itselfbut also for the building, as a result of complaints or even damage due to a poor functioningventilation system.
As everybody knows, today the air quality of an indoor environment may have several effectson our health; the beginning of serious breathing pathologies and of some forms of cancer,are with no doubt due to the presence of polluting and extremely noxious agents in the placeswe most frequently use.That's the reason why it is very important that indoor rooms are correctly aired also in ourhomes where, due to several incidental factors, the healthiness of the environment is stillguaranteed by the mere and discretionary operation of users of opening the windows.In considering the growing attenti
Four types of heat-pipe heat recovery systems were tested for application in passive stackventilation. The effects of fin shape, pipe arrangement and air velocity on the heat recoveryeffectiveness were investigated. The air velocity was found to have a significant effect on theeffectiveness of heat recovery; the effectiveness decreasing with increasing air velocity.The pressure loss coefficient for heat pipe units was also determined.
Login