repeatability

In this study, 5 passive houses were tested several times over a period of 6 or 11 years. Besides the repeated testing, information about the conditions of the buildings service over the period between the successive tests was collected in order to explain the differences between the test results. The buildings were tested by...

The information about uncertainly is essential to correct interpretation of any measurement. Therefore, several authors investigated the reproducibility and repeatability of airtightness measurement during the last years. The experiments were carried out in real buildings of different size and in actual climatic conditions which complicates the comparison...

The airtightness test result is typicaly compared with a limiting value (compliance check), with the results of other tests of the same object by the same technician (when controling the evolution of airtightness during construction process) or with a test result of another technician (when verifying a suspicious result). These tasks need a...

Due to the wind induced pressure, different results may be obtained if the inside-outside pressure difference is measured across different locations on the building envelope, i.e. if the external pressure tap of a differential pressure sensor measuring this pressure difference is placed in different positions. Therefore, the position of the external pressure tap may influence an airtightness test result as well.

This paper present the results of a test programme to validate the Dutch pre-normative protocol NVN 5623 ‘Radioactivity measurements: Determination of the activity of gamma-ray emitting nuclides in a counting sample by means of semi-conductor gamma-spectr