Commercial cooking equipment exhaust systems have a significant impact on the total energy consumption of Foodservice facilities. It is estimated that commercial cooking exhaust ventilation capacity in food-service facilities across the United States totals 3 billion cfm (1 . 4 billion L/s) with an associated annual energy cost approaching $3 billion, based on an average of $1/cfm ($0.47 per L/s) per year. Significant energy and cost savings can be achieved by reducing ventilation rates.

This paper presents results of applying the capture and containment test procedures in ASTM Fl 704-96, Standard Test Method for Performance of Commercial Kitchen Ventilation Systems, to determine the threshold capture and containment exhaust flow rates for a number of cooking appliances and two types of kitchen exhaust hoods.

This paper presents a new technology for capture and containment testing in commercial kitchen ventilation research. It is called large-scale focusing schlieren system and offers a nonintrusive approach to effluent flow observation. Schlieren systems can be added to conventional kitchen ventilation research laboratories or other hood testing facilities and allow continuous observation of a large area around a hood-appliance setup.

Laboratory hoods are designed to capture contaminants generated in the laboratory and discharge them outside. In many laboratories this results in several fan systems. To provide a convenient location for maintenance to service the fans, the fans are often located in penthouses. Good design of laboratory ventilation requires that the duct be negative in occupied spaces. However. it is not possible to design a fan room or penthouse with the duct negative downstream of the fan.

The use of the laboratory fume hood as the primary containment device in the laboratory has been a standard practice for almost half a century. Quantitative testing of the performance of these devices, however; is a more recent discipline. The use of the ANSI/ASHRAE 110-1995, Method of Testing Performance of Laboratory Fume Hoods (ASH RAE 1995) is becoming a standard specification in the purchase of new fume hoods, the commissioning of new laboratory facilities, and benchmarking fume hoods in existing facilities.

ANSI/ASHRAE 110-1995, Method of Testing Performance of Laboratory Fume Hoods (ASHRAE 1995) yields quantitative data about fume hood containment and can be used in a classical total quality management (TQM) approach to process improvement. This involves measuring process indicators, analyzing probable causes of poor performance, implementing changes to the process, and again measuring the indicators to determine the efficacy of the changes implemented.

This study was conducted to determine how sash movements affect the performance of fume hoods. The performance of two fume hoods was studied as the sashes were moved from closed to open position at speeds of 2 ft/s, 1.5 ft/s, and 1 ft/s. The tests were conducted with fume hoods operated at both constant volume and variable air volume. The tests indicate that sash movements can disturb airflow patterns at the face of the hood and potentially affect the performance of the hood. The effect of the sash movement varied with hood type and speed of sash movement.

A time constant has been proposed to characterize the time it takes to fill an atrium space with smoke for design purposes. This was defined through the use of the empirical equation expressing the mass entrainment rate to the 312 power of the clear height. However, the equation holds only when the flame tip touches the smoke layer, and the flame temperature was taken to be 1100 K (827°C 1521°F).

The purpose of this project was to evaluate duct sealing as a means of reducing the energy consumption of hot air distribution systems in central Pennsylvania houses. Five houses were studied, all of which were heated with forced-air electric heat pump systems. During the winter of 1995, the heat pump energy consumption, supply air temperature, and the temperature at the thermostat were monitored continuously for approximately two months prior to the duct retrofit. A test also was performed to measure the leakiness of the ductwork.