Dilution versus displacement ventilation - environmental conditions in a garment sewing plant

This paper compares the practice of dilution ventilation (DILVENT), which ideally requires perfect mixing, with displacement ventilation (DISPVENT), which involves fresh air displacing contaminated air without mixing. Keeping DILVENT as a reference the approach of intervention was used to estimate the potential of DISPVENT for improving environmental conditions in a garment sewing plant. Air exchange efficiency of DILVENT came to 49%. DISPVENT improved the efficiency lo a level of 57%. At workstation level DISPVENT improved air renewal by a factor of 1 .3.

Visualization of measured three dimensional well mixed zones of temperature in a ventilated space.

A new model concept has been developed to model the three dimensional energy and mass transfer in an imperfectly mixed fluid. The model permits to predict the dynamic behaviour of the volumetric concentration of heat flow, mass flow and fluid flow. A laboratory test installation has been built to analyse the model capabilities to predict the dynamic behaviour of the air flow pattern within a ventilated space in order to control the energy and mass transfer in the ventilated space.

Mixing VS.displacement ventilation in terms of air diffusion effectiveness.

In occupational hygiene the common practice is to use dilution ventilation (MIXVENT) which ideally requires perfect mixing. Increasingly, however, displacement ventilation (DISPVENT) is being applied; ideally this involves fresh air displacing contaminated air without mixing. Keeping MIXVENT as a reference the approach of intervention was used to estimate the potential of DISPVENT for improving environmental conditions in a garment sewing plant. Air exchange efficiency of MIXVENT came to 49%. DISPVENT improved the efficiency to a level of 57%.

Pages